Iowa farmers Landon Brown and Keaton Krueger have both previously tried using strip-till instead of no-till in the hopes of seeing a yield boost that covers the cost of the extra tillage pass. This year, they decided to conduct replicated trials to rigorously test whether the two planting methods resulted in yield differences in their corn (Brown) and soybeans (Krueger). Brown reports that he has anecdotally seen no economic benefit from strip-till in the past on his farm. Depending on the results of this trial, he “might quit doing strip-till to save money, time and fuel.” In a trial in 2023, Krueger found that strip-till soybeans on his farm yielded the same as no-till soybeans despite the strip-till beans looking better and having a higher stand count. He reports that “if I find no difference between strip-till and no-till again, I will likely abandon testing strip-till and just no-till my soybeans.”
Both Brown and Krueger planted strip-till and no-till treatments of their cash crops in 2024. Brown planted corn following relayed rye and soybeans and a cereal rye cover crop. Kreuger planted corn following soybean and a cereal rye and radish cover crop. Planting details and field management at both farms are presented in Table 1. Cooperators established treatments in randomized, paired strips: 2 treatments × 4 replications = 8 strips total.
Both Brown and Krueger recorded grain yield and moisture using a yield monitor or weigh wagon. Reported soybean yields are corrected to 13% moisture and corn yields are corrected to 15.5% moisture. The cooperators also documented costs of equipment passes and applied products.
To evaluate the effect of treatment on soybean or corn yield and moisture, we calculated Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) using a two-way ANOVA that accounts for treatment and replicate location at the 95% confidence level. If the difference in metric between the two treatments was greater than the HSD, we would expect such a difference to occur 95 times out of 100 under the same conditions – we refer to this as a statistically significant effect. On the other hand, if the resulting difference between the two treatments was less than the HSD, we would consider the results to be statistically similar. Note that a single HSD value is not available for Brown’s results because he had a different number of strip-till and no-till treatments. We could make these statistical calculations because both Brown’s and Krueger’s experimental designs involved replication and randomization of their treatments.
At harvest, Landon Brown reported that he could not visually tell where his no-till and strip-till treatments started and stopped (top). However, corn ear size appeared more variable in the no-till vs. strip-till treatments (bottom). Photos taken Oct. 1, 2024.
Brown found no statistically significant difference in yield between his strip-till and no-till corn. Because he estimates that he spent $22/ac on strip tillage, his net return on the strip-till corn was $22/ac less than his net return on the no-till corn. Brown reports that he has been informally trialing strip-till vs. no-till since he switched to no-till in 2016, he has never found that strip tillage is economically worth it. Even though he routinely observes about a 5-6 bu/ac yield advantage for strip-till, that is not an economic advantage once he accounts for the costs of fuel, time spent tilling and the cost of owning a strip-till bar.
Early in the season, Brown observed some differences in ground and corn plant condition between his no-till and strip-till treatments. Prior to corn establishment, there was erosion and wash-out of the tilled strips on the rolling hillslopes of his field. As farmers often report, the strip-till corn looked a bit better than the no-till corn prior to maturity. However, by harvest, there were no visible differences in the corn plants between treatments, though corn ear size appeared to be more variable in the no-till treatments (see photos above).
Soybean yield in Keaton Krueger’s strip-till vs. no-till trial in 2024. Vertical lines on each bar show the standard deviation (SD), which is a measure of how much the yields measured in each replicate are spread out from their mean. Unlike Brown’s corn yield, Krueger had very little variability in yield within his strip-till and no-till treatments. Measured yields show only a little overlap of his strip-till and no-till yield values, and statistical analysis showed that with 95% confidence, strip-tillage increased soybean yield compared to no-till (HSD = 3 bu/ac). Different letters above bars indicate significantly different yields.
In contrast to Brown’s results, Krueger found that his strip-till soybeans narrowly but significantly outyielded his no-till soybeans by 3 bu/ac in 2024. He estimates that his strip-till pass cost $20/ac. Since he sold the soybeans for $10.25/bu, his return on investment in the strip-till treatment was $13.83/ac.
Krueger reflected that this year’s trial builds on his previous research into strip-tilling soybeans on his farm. In 2023, he conducted the same trial and found that while soybean stand count was lower in his no-till treatment, there was no difference in yield between the strip-till and no-till treatments. “This is the second year I have done a strip-till vs. no-till soybean trial. The first year, the results were not strong enough for me to draw a conclusion and the yield results did not match my observation in the field. Now that I have done the trial a second year, I feel more confident in adopting strip-tillage.”
After finding that strip-till corn resulted in no significant yield increase and decreased net profits compared to no-till corn in 2024, Brown thinks that in the future, he will stick to no-till planting on his farm. Krueger, in contrast, found that his strip-tilled soybeans yielded higher and had a higher net profit than his no-till soybeans. He shared that “I think my default will be strip-till for 2025. If I decide to do the trial one more time, that will help me be really confident.” Brown and Krueger’s differing results and conclusions highlight the fact that strip tillage may be an economically valuable reduced-tillage method for some farms but will likely not be economically worth it depending on the crop grown, commodity price received, field and weather conditions and tillage and labor costs of each farm and farming year.
